🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with health policies. Last month, international health experts issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “according to global recommended threshold”, delayed for at least twelve months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses rising levels of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.