🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.