🔗 Share this article

The date 2025 might sound more futuristic. Perhaps it's the presence of the consonant "f" in "five". However 2026 represents one step beyond, a moment where we currently stand, with each science-fiction-style advancement – chiefly the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence – seeming bleak, or possibly even worse. (It often seems like in a proper dystopia, the mind-dulling corporate-backed anti-human technology would actually function more effectively?) Did no one warn us about this?

The answer, at least regarding science fiction films made long ago (or sometimes months ago) set in 2026, is both yes and no. Some of these prophecies are broadly applicable (worldwide disaster) but in detail implausible (when mankind is ultimately decimated, we will most likely take the primate species alongside us). Others of them are prescient; the rest just resemble bad visual effects. But it's valuable to explore where different directors, from geniuses to journeymen, thought we'd be positioned by this time in our planet's development. So let's examine a selection of the movies that have been set in 2026 throughout cinematic history and determine if they have anything to teach us.

The Game 'Doom'

Now, this isn't promising. In the universe of the video game adaptation *Doom*, whose 20th anniversary was recently celebrated by hardly anyone, 2026 is the year that mankind discovers a gateway to an long-lost metropolis on Mars, where the inhabitants of Earth are able to establish a scientific outpost. Currently, the bad stuff – regarding narrative and concerning over-the-top film versions of a first-person-shooter video game – does not actually transpire for two more decades later, so even if we do discover a Martian gateway this year, we could gain a respite to avoid catastrophe. Were we to discover a passageway to an old Martian city, it's truly hard to tell whether a certain tech billionaire would remain super-psyched to send everyone to Mars or would instantly become disheartened that the discovery was not a thing he funded himself, allowing him to claim savior-like credit for humanity's journey to the cosmos. This precedes we consider the harvesting of extraterrestrial genetics and subsequent transformations into horrific creatures. (Once more, this is nearer 2046, distinct from the acclaimed director's film.) In general, *Doom* is (if nothing else) a useful example for why, exactly we let Mars become a long-term hope for mankind. Whether in the director's cheap-looking space-western *Ghosts of Mars*, the realistic sci-fi of *Red Planet*, or the woo-woo spiritualism of *Mission to Mars*, our distant neighbor planet rarely serve as a beacon of optimism. Should someone wants to close that dubious red-planet property deal, perhaps they ought to begin with at least making the fantasy version look good.

Marvel's Lesser Offerings

One of the strangest features of the present Marvel Cinematic Universe is the way it handles the various world-threatening disasters, encompassing a half-decade leap whose occurrences are largely not shown in the films themselves; the movies have turned into a alarm clock constantly set a few seconds fast – only instead of minutes, it's annual increments. So there's a large assortment of MCU content that fan sites helpfully explain to be set in 2026. The better entries, like *Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3* and the underrated romp *The Marvels*, take place far away from Earth, and so seem quite unmoored from any concrete sense of time. But the poorer material is some of the worst Marvel has created: the nonsensically meandering TV show *Secret Invasion* and the Zoom-call debacle of *Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania*. Judging by this stuff, we're facing a great deal of frustrating stagnation in 2026, along with the accompanying spin that actually, this nonsensical crap happening before our eyes is essential to future events. Even worse, in the actual world that assertion will probably prove accurate.

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes

Most of the classic five-film *Planet of the Apes* series is located in the more distant tomorrow of Earth, but the modern series that began with 2011’s *Rise of the Planet of the Apes* begins nearer the present, starting its chronology around 2016. So by the time a pathogen that devastates the majority of Earth’s people has done its damage, and simultaneously enhanced the cognitive abilities of primates, it’s merely 2026, with further human indignities (and victories for apes) ahead. The end-credits sequence of *Rise*, illustrating how rapidly this contagion propagates globally and set in 2019, appears profoundly unsettling in the wake of the real-world global health crisis that would begin in 2020. In contrast, the movie *Dawn* looks less literal; if you can believe it, we’re already six years out from the spread of Covid-19, and society, though obviously wounded by the ongoing virus, hasn't been wiped out, and our technology definitely hasn't been disabled. Yet this bleakest of the four modern *Apes* movies (at least so far!) still has a substantial downer in store, suggesting that the fundamental nature of beings, however one defines either, will inevitably lead to violent conflict, no matter the work of the best-intentioned among us. We’re subject to the whims of those who appeal to others’ baser impulses, although those instincts don't represent the most. Right now, it seems hard to dispute that, despite the fact that we ought to try.

The Silent Classic

By far the most prominent portrayal of 2026 in cinema is from a movie nearing celebrating its centennial. Fritz Lang’s silent classic *Metropolis* takes place in a city of tomorrow where wealthy industrialists preside over the skyscrapers as workers toil below the surface on the equipment that keep everything running. Affluent surface resident Freder, son of the city’s ruler, has his perspective changed to these enormous social gaps when he becomes obsessed with Maria, an underground organizer who preaches a reconciliation of the two halves of Metropolis. A inventor with darker plans creates a automaton in her image, hoping to bring the entire Metropolis down in flames. Here, a machine designed to mimic a human isn't a tool of the elite, but an entity who desires to see them destroyed; it's a component inverted by the modern world in a vision of tomorrow that otherwise seems to be well on its way. *Metropolis* also imagines a world where technology depends on traditional manual labor, which appears as a most logical union of conservative contempt for “the working class” and corporate zeal for an tech boom. It hasn't yet materialized, but it's easy to imagine a slightly more utilitarian version of Lang’s city growing with the promise of a return to industrial production. The more complex, harder-to-imagine accomplishment is the conclusion of the film, where the chasm between the wealthy and the have-nots is bridged with love; not so much with specific policies. Like *Dawn of the Planet of the Apes*, the movie pleads for peaceful cohabitation; in contrast to *Dawn*, it appears optimistic about the chance